It is hard to find a positive word about Facebook (NASDAQ FB), possibly for a good reason.
As the dominant social media platform, it has experienced its fair share of controversy and accusations of impropriety since its inception in 2004. Controversies that readily come to mind include misusing user data and helping bad-faith actors interfere with US elections. The latter accusation, may be a a little tenuous. Nonetheless, I'm firmly in the camp that believes that the world would be better off without the platform existing. It appears that Facebook's own research may back up this assertion, as revealed by data scientist and former Facebook Product Manager turned Whistleblower, Frances Haugen.
Haugen left Facebook in May 2021, but not before scanning thousands of pages worth of documents pertaining to internal research the Company had conducted. The research purports to acknowledge the harm that Facebook and its family of apps cause to its youngest user's mental health, in addition to its use in spreading misinformation (npr, 2021). This research was not openly disclosed.
Haugen spent Wednesday testifying in front of US congress and called for policymakers to consider regulating Facebook. Since 2018, Haugen argues, Facebook's algorithm has prioritised a newsfeed that is dangerous, inflammatory, and yields unhealthy side effects (nytimes, 2021).
It could be that Haugen's whistleblowing will strengthen policymakers' resolve to regulate Facebook.
Haugen has filed eight whistleblower complaints with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (cbs, 2021). As a publicly listed Company, Facebook owes a duty of care to its investors to disclose information relevant to its performance. Arguably, the results of its internal research should have been disclosed, or at the very least, the Company should not be misleading the public about its progress to combat its harmful offshoots or omitting what its research shows to be true. This is what Haugen's expose has revealed to the SEC (cbs, 2021). If the SEC proceeds with opening a case in relation to Haugen's allegations, FB Stock may experience a material impact.
On the day that the whistleblower story broke, Monday 4 October, FB stock fell 2.77%. Coincidently, Facebook and its family of apps experienced a 7-hour outage on the very same day that may have heightened investors’ concerns about the stock. Although, to put the 2.77% into perspective, it should be noted that FB Stock experienced very similar and frequent drops over the course September without any obvious causes.
By the close of Wednesday, at the time of writing, Facebook has almost clawed itself back to its Monday opening price. FB stock rose 1.33% on Tuesday and another 1.18% on Wednesday.
Another day, another set of earning reports.
Wednesday's focus is on McDonald's (NYSE: MCD), Facebook (NASDAQ: FB), Shopify (NYSE: SHOP), PayPal (NASDAQ: PYPL), and Spotify (NYSE: SPOT).
As these earning reports are coming in halfway through the week, it would be interesting to note each Company's stock price movements since Monday. Investors can be fickle, and last-minute adjustments may be seen in these trendy household names.
Investors have been upsizing their orders for McDonald's stock in the past week and a half. The price movement is in stark contrast to the ranging the stock has experienced since May. The price of MCD has grown from a 4-month low of US ~$226 up to an all-time high of US ~$246. In the two days of this week, investors are dieting, and the price growth has slowed. On Tuesday trading, McDonald's stock rose 0.99% and then an additional 0.11% in after-hours.
McDonald's is anticipated to report revenue of US $5.6B before the bell on Wednesday. Investors expect the Company to continue recovering its sales, a trend suggested in the Company's last quarterly report. There has been no indication that this might not be so. The only great barrier to the Company's recovery is the Delta variant of Covid spreading in America. Although, this concern is too recent to have likely interfered with McDonald's 2Q report.
Now, looking at Facebooks share price movement in the same calendar period as McDonald's paints a slightly different picture. Last week was kind to FB, with a 4% price jump occurring on the final day, closing the stock at US $374.88. Investors appear to believe that this last jump was a little too ambitious and has since retraced to US $367.80. Although, it is safely above the 23.6% Fib level.
At the close of Wednesday trading, Facebook is expected to report revenue of US $27.9B. Bear in mind, Facebook's peers have all beat their earnings forecasts this week and last, and the market would hardly be surprised if it were to follow suit. However, the positive news may not translate to a lift in share price. This is a misfortune that befell Apple on Tuesday after its earnings report came back exceedingly positive. In after-hours trading, APPL was trading down 2.1%. Perhaps FB slight retracement on Tuesday will mean there is room for growth if Facebook massively beats its estimate.
Shopify has had a more dramatic retracement this week in the lead up to its earnings report. Falling from US $1,640 to US $1,553, or approximately 5.3%.
The stock price has found resistance around US $1,540 – 1,555 price several times in the past month and a half. The share price is, of course, currently just below the upper bound of this range.
Shopify has a custom of radically surpassing its estimated quarterly revenue. In its past four quarterly reports, SHOP has exceeded its estimated revenue by an average of 39%.
SHOP is likely to beat its estimates again in Q2, as several of the Company's cash-generating payment features start to carve out a more prominent presence on the Company balance sheet.
Last week the US Senate confirmed the appointment of Lina Kahn as chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). A lawyer and academic known for her antitrust research, Kahn is the youngest ever chair of the department responsible for policing the US’s biggest corporations.
With Kahn at the helm of the FTC, companies hailing from silicon valley could finally be held account for their antitrust and anticompetition practices. The organisations likely to be first to garner Kahn’s attentions are those Big Tech household names that hog much of the media headlines.
It is not just headlines that Big Tech hog. They also hog much of the weight of US indices, in particular the Nasdaq100. Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Facebook (NASDAQ: FB), Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL, GOOG), Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) make up approximately half of the weight of the Nasdaq100. As such, some argue they are a little too big. All the above examples have operations spanning multiple disparate industries and find it a little too easy to stifle innovation and competition by buying up rivals as they emerge.
Khan has already indicated that she plans to apply special scrutiny to the Big Tech players in her role as FTC chair. Support for her security could find cross-party support as her stance on Big Tech was widely known by democrats and republicans alike before her confirmation as FTC chair. If United States Democrats and Republicans can agree on anything, it might be in regard to the need to rein in Big Tech.
Kahn’s scrutiny could extend as far as proposing and bringing forward action to break up some of the Big Tech companies into several smaller, more manageable companies (from a regulatory perspective). If this is a road that Kahn and her team push down, whether eventually successful or not, we can expect a high level of uncertainty and instability in the Nasdaq100. As of writing (Thursday 24/06), the Nasdaq100 hit a record level above 14,200, largely on the back of the growth experienced in Big Tech. This could be a case of 'the bigger they are, the harder they fall'.
One of the first events the FTC will be scrutinising during Kahn tenure is the acquisition of MGM Studios by Amazon. Typically, the FTC would share responsibility with the Department of Justice to review the proposed Amazon-MGM merger. However, it is said that the FTC lobbied for the right to examine this merger as it already has an open investigation into Amazon’s antitrust practices.
It appears that Kahn has already begun to apply her special level of scrutiny to the Big Tech behemoths. However, as it stands, the market is yet to react to Kahn's appointment. In fact, Big Tech have never been more popular with investors (MSFT recently joined Apple in the $2 Trillion club), while the Nasdaq is hitting fresh intraday records every other day.
We're trying something new here at Blackbull Markets! With MT5 on the Horizon, Blackbull Market clients will soon be able to have access to over 350 US stocks to trade. Hence, we're adding a new weekly article: Stock of the week! If you have any questions or have any stocks, in particular, you want us to cover in more detail, let us know.
We all know what Facebook is – however, broken down, they are a social media conglomerate comprised of their primary business Facebook with full ownership stakes in social media platforms Instagram and WhatsApp. All of their companies combined host 2.5 Billion users. To put that into perspective, there are an estimated 7.8 billion people on this planet, therefore their platforms host just under a third of the population.
Facebook, like many tech firms, generate revenue through selling advertising on their platforms. Last year, Facebook and its family of products generated $70.697 Billion in revenue, up from $55.838 Billion in 2018. Currently, founder Mark Zuckerberg is the CEO of the company.
Facebook, like many tech firms, are flush with cash and have high operating margins. Over the past two years, Facebook has had an average net operating margin of 40%. Due to the nature of the online business, it has held steady during the peak Coronavirus pandemic as everyone retreated to their homes, reliant on the internet.
Facebook currently gets the bulk of its advertising revenue from its main products, Facebook, and Facebook messenger. They have slowly introduced advertisements on Instagram; however, they have not monetized WhatsApp whatsoever. These two products alone, if monetized to their full potential, may provide a significant upside to their revenue and stock price. This is not to mention the other avenues they have stated to be perusing, such as Facebook Shops and dating.
Facebook have seen their fair share of scrutiny. From the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018 to the recent boycott in advertisers due to Mark Zuckerberg's relatively non-governance stance for news on Facebook. Events like these risks a decline in revenues if boycotts gain traction. However, a bulk of Facebook's income comes from small to medium-sized businesses, reliant on the 2.5 Billion active users to promote their goods or services. Therefore, these risks are quite low and should not post an immediate threat in the long run to the stock price.
Their stock is at an all-time high. Today, the stock sits at $261.08c, trading at a 33 times price-to-earnings multiple.
Tailwinds have come from the Coronavirus pandemic, forcing people to stay at home alongside the government having a negative stance on TikTok. Furthermore, they recently announced their TikTok competitor, Facebook reels. If President Donald Trump is successful in banning TikTok in the United States, this will be a massive tailwind for Facebook.
Facebook is likely poised to excel in the longer term, especially with Mark Zuckerberg at the company's helm. He has shown to have shareholders' interests at heart, mainly because he currently owns a 13.3% stake.
Fed's Chairman Jerome Powell has a clear message: They will not step off the gas when it regards stimulus. He stated in the previous Fed meeting, "We are not thinking about thinking about raising rates." Today? "We are not thinking about thinking about THINKING ABOUT raising rates." The Federal Reserve left rates unchanged, fluctuating from 0 to 0.25%.
Fed will continue to leave all support lines open, including bond-buying, low-interest rates, and dollar swaps for the foreseeable future. However, Chairman Powell states that the fed "[has not] looked at buying equities" and that they "[the fed] aims to ensure a strong recovery and to limit the damage." The Fed plans to keep on propping up the economy, no matter the implications/effects on the economy.
Jerome Powell also praised the banks stating they "have been a source of strength in this crisis" and that "banks are well-capitalized and strong." The conference drew minimal but expected moves from the market—gold slightly up while downwards pressure was placed on the dollar against major pairs. Equity markets edge sharply higher with the NASDAQ finishing at.
While Chairman Powell spoke, a battle at Capitol hill (virtually) was ensuing against Congress and the CEO's of the 4 of the biggest tech companies: Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. As they have grown to a collective market cap of just under 5 trillion dollars, they all have faced increased scrutiny regarding their market power and anti-trust issues.
CEO Jeff Bezos has been taking most of the brunt from congress as comments from the subcommittee grills him about anti-competitive practices on Amazon. With Bezos being the only CEO of the four that has not been to a congressional hearing, he has been relatively flustered with the questions, with Bloomberg Technology Reporter Spencer Soper stating that he is "clearly rattled, stammering quite a bit under tough questioning."
It is not Mark Zuckerberg's first rodeo dealing with congress; he has testified previously, usually when Facebook attracts a lot of heat re: Cambridge Analytica scandal. He got scrutinized over their acquisition of Instagram, saying that they bullied the Instagram founders by showing them a product they were going to release called "Facebook Camera" if they did not sell the business to them. This continues with Snapchat, bullying CEO Even Speigel that he [Zuckrberg) would try to destroy the app if Speigel did not sell to Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg's response essentially states that Facebook copied a lot of competitors' features.
Google's CEO Sundar Pichai is fending questions regarding the grip Google has on their users' online lives as they control much of the Search, Email, Video, and Directions space. So far, Pichai has been the most defensive, using techniques to redirect questions and answering half questions. However, this seems to be enough for congress as they don't seem to be pushing hard on Pichai.
Apple's CEO Tim Cook got away with three and a half hours into the testimony, only being questioned about the App Store once. However, post recess, they continued to grill Cook about the accepting and rejecting of apps. However, it seems like congress is clutching on straws with no footing to substantiate the claim that Apple is engaging in unfair practices. They are struggling to shake Tim Cook. This is compared to Amazon's CEO Jeff Bezos, who has been repeatedly flustered with the questions thrown at him.
There is a lot of going on this week, which means a lot of volatility in the markets—trade safe, Trade Cautiously.
Large tech stocks have rebounded spectacularly in an environment where everyone is fully dependent on the wonders of the internet. The NASDAQ, which is heavily weighted to technology stocks, has outperformed the S&P 500 year to date by just under 14%, reaching an all-time high. Many analysts state that the market has been overstretched – with the Fed propping up the stock market and retail investors buying the dip. With regards to tech stocks, however, are these prices justified?
To keep it relatively simple, we’ll stick to the FANG stocks. If we take a look at their P/E Ratios over the past five years
We can see that Google and Netflix have historically traded at extremely bloated multiples, with Facebook and Apple trading at multiples relatively closer to earth. However, if we look at the current prices (as of 10th / 06 / 2020),
They are all currently trading below their average P/E ratio over the last 5 years. A bullish case could be made on the premise that if investors are consistently paying for their premiums even when their premiums were consistently questioned, would it not make sense that they have tentatively earned their bonus due to their ability to generate free cash flow during unprecedented times like these? If they were historically overpriced before the pandemic, would that suggest that they’re currently fairly priced? If we take it a step further – if they were priced reasonably due to their growth rate before the pandemic – would that suggest they’re currently underpriced?
With central banks lowering interest rates to 0, the search for yield has become short of impossible. Furthermore, treasuries have not performed as well as gold as the ballast for a typical portfolio. The cash position with the likes Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are reaching heights even Berkshire Hathaway has not seen, with Microsoft also having the covenant Triple-A rating on their bonds. Their ability to generate revenue regardless of the conditions alongside fortress-like balance sheet solidify their position as a haven in many portfolios. In a world where interest rates are low, stocks like the Apples and Microsoft’s provide a chance at a positive yield dividend and capital appreciation.
PNC’s Financial Services Group, who amassed $14 Billion recently from the sale of its BlackRock stock, is waiting for valuations to cool off before putting their capital to use. Chief Executive Officer William Demchak stated that PNC “will be patient” and that “[the coronavirus] hasn’t begun to play out in our economy in terms of what the impacts are and what the opportunity set will be that comes out of it.”
Are you joining the tech stock rally?